• submitting the application form with abstract by May 15. 2021 (Author Zone, fill in online).
  • paper submission by May 30, 2021 (Author Zone)
  • acceptance/revision/rejection of the article after the double-blind review until June 30, 2021
  • revised paper, taking into account reviewers' comments submitted online via Author Zone by July 15, 2021
  • acceptance by the reviewers of the revised texts by July 30, 2021
  • payment of a conference fee to the author and co-authors by June 30, 2021, amounting to PLN 1070 (the conference fee does not include accommodation) Bank account: the Foundation for Dissemination of Knowledge and Science "Cognitione", os.Bohaterów Tobruku 5, 34-400 Nowy Targ - 87 1020 3466 0000 9102 0117 8060 (IBAN: PL(account number)), BIC (SWIFT): BPKOPLPW with a note - 20th Conference - First and last name
  • detailed information on the schedule of presentations will be provided later


  • articles will appear in the peer-reviewed monograph at the turn of October / December 2021. 
  • Declaration for Authors

    The declaration for authors should be given during the conference or signed as a scanned document and sent to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

    Declaration for Authors  

    Paper template

    Review form


Editorial notes for conference papers

The article should be provided in electronic form (Microsoft Word). Standard A4 page with standard margins (2.5cm). Text should be written in Times New Roman font - 12 points, spacing between lines 1.0. The title of the article in bold 14 points. Footnotes directly in the text, e.g. (Nowak, 2009 or Nowak & Kowalski, 2016). If the paper contains graphs, graphics, attach the source files. We designate the tables at the beginning - we give the source under the table, while the captions and the source under the drawings. The manuscript should be no less than 15-20 pages. Abstract with the title at the beginning of the article. In the end, biographical note (s). Published previous monographs can be found in the "Monographs" menu. The edition applies to the last issue published in 2019. The use of a PAPER TEMPLATE is obligatory.

Reviewing procedure

To evaluate each submitted publication, at least two independent reviewers will be appointed. The adopted solution is a model in which the author(s) and reviewers do not know their identities (the so-called "double-blind peer review process"). The review is in writing and ends with an unequivocal conclusion as to whether the article is accepted for publication is rejected. The publication will be approved/rejected if the merit criteria and the editing criteria are/are not met.


Ghostwriting and guest authorship

Reliability is one of the foundations on which we build quality in science. Readers should be absolutely certain that the authors of the publication transparently, reliably and honestly present the results of their work, irrespective of whether they are its direct authors or whether they used the support of some specialized entity (natural or legal person). The proof of the scientist's ethical behavior and the highest editorial standards should be found in the openness of information concerning the subjects contributing to the publication (merit, material, financial and other contributions). This is a reflection of not only decency but also of social responsibility.

"Ghostwriting" takes place when someone made a significant contribution to the creation of the publication, but their role was not revealed either as one of the authors or in the acknowledgments included in the article. "Guest authorship" ("honorary authorship") happens when the author's contribution is negligible or when the contribution never occurred and yet they are the author/co-author of the publication. All discovered cases will be exposed, including passing this information to relevant entities (institutions employing the authors, scientific societies, associations of scientific editors, etc.).

To prevent any cases of "ghostwriting" and "guest authorship" the editors oblige the authors to submit a signed declaration on this matter.

JEMI and Conference use the digital archiving policy and deposit policy directory of the National Library of Poland.

Academic ethics policy

The publishers have a strict policy on plagiarism. We check for any plagiarism issues using two methods: a plagiarism prevention tool ( and a review check. All submissions will be checked through before being sent to reviewers.

As in many other journals (like our JEMI) the Editorial Board:

"Follows the rules on academic writing and academic ethics, according to the work by M. Roig (2003; 2006) Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing, available online at

We suggest that all potential contributors to the conference, reviewers and readers duly follow this guidance in order to avoid any misconceptions in academic writing. 

Editors and reviewers will blind referee all manuscripts following the guidelines explicitly highlighted by COPE